Evolution of moral and double moral standards in structured populations

Main publications:
  • Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions, Dirk Helbing, Attila Szolnoki, Matjaž Perc and György Szabó, PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000758 (2010).
  • Punish, but not too hard: How costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game, Dirk Helbing, Attila Szolnoki, Matjaž Perc and György Szabó, New J. Phys. 12, 083005 (2010).
  • Defector-accelerated cooperativeness and punishment in public goods games with mutations, Dirk Helbing, Attila Szolnoki, Matjaž Perc and György Szabó, Phys. Rev. E 81, 057104 (2010).
  • Read also the Nature News: Who should pay for the police? coverage by Philip Ball.

Related papers and open problems:
  • Are there evolutionary advantages to conditional punishment? Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation, Attila Szolnoki and Matjaž Perc, J. Theor. Biol. 325, 34-41 (2013)
  • Self-organization yes, but of reward or of punishment? Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding, Attila Szolnoki and Matjaž Perc, New J. Phys. 14, 093016 (2012)
  • Adaptive or steady punishment? Self-organization of punishment in structured populations, Matjaž Perc and Attila Szolnoki, New J. Phys. 14, 043013 (2012).
  • When is the pool empty? Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders, Matjaž Perc, Scientific Reports 2, 344 (2012).
  • Peer or pool punishment? Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool punishment, Attila Szolnoki, György Szabó and Matjaž Perc, Phys. Rev. E 83, 036101 (2011).
  • Carrot or the stick? Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game, Attila Szolnoki and Matjaž Perc, EPL 92, 38003 (2010).

Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Electronic address: matjaz.perc@uni-mb.si

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Why do friends spontaneously come up with mutually accepted rules, cooperation, and solidarity, while the creation of shared moral standards often fails in large communities? In a ''global village'', where everybody may interact with anybody else, it is not worthwhile to punish people who cheat. Moralists (cooperative individuals who undertake punishment efforts) disappear because of their disadvantage compared to cooperators who do not punish (so-called ''second-order free-riders''). However, cooperators are exploited by free-riders. This creates a ''tragedy of the commons'', where everybody is uncooperative in the end. Yet, when people interact with friends or local neighbors, as most people do, moralists can escape the direct competition with non-punishing cooperators by separating from them. Moreover, in the competition with free-riders, moralists can defend their interests better than non-punishing cooperators. Therefore, while seriously depleted in the beginning, moralists can finally spread all over the world (''who laughs last laughs best effect''). Strikingly, the presence of a few noncooperative individuals (''deviant behavior'') can accelerate the victory of moralists. In order to spread, moralists may also form an ''unholy cooperation'' with people having double moral standards, i.e., free-riders who punish non-cooperative behavior, while being uncooperative themselves. These observations change under strategy mutations as follows. Expectedly, frequent mutations create well-mixed conditions, which support the spreading of defectors. However, when the mutation rate is small, the final stationary state does not differ significantly from the state of the mutation-free case, independently of the values of the punishment fine and cost. Nevertheless, the mutation rate affects the relaxation dynamics. Rare mutations can largely accelerate the spreading of costly punishment. This is due to the fact that the presence of defectors breaks the balance of power between both cooperative strategies, which leads to a different kind of dynamics.


SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEOS

We provide three supplementary videos pertaining to the above papers. All videos are in AVI format and may require additional video codecs for displaying properly. Videos can be accessed individually via the provided links or by clicking on the appropriate regions of the phase diagrams depicted below. If you have difficulties viewing the AVI videos please try downloading them in the MOV QuickTime format. The MOV files are also approximately half the size of AVI files.

AVI (Windows PC): Suplementary video 1  Suplementary video 2  Suplementary video 3
MOV (Apple Mac): Suplementary video 1  Suplementary video 2  Suplementary video 3